Some people also need fake scapegoats for real problems. Adriana Science and religion are more often than not, not compatible because they offer different accounts of our origins as a species, or the origins of our universe. Unless a person chooses to keep them compartmentalized by cognitive dissonance, for exampleclashes are inevitable. I dislike the word spirituality, but I can understand the awe experience by Daniel Sarewitz in Cambodia while seeing the majestic temples, I have felt that before many times when visiting sites of cultural importance, especially if magnificent architecture is combined with beautiful scenery.
Can Science Replace Religion? Hawking believes that M-theory may hold the ultimate key to understanding everything, even the birth of the universe. Therefore, the need for religion becomes unnecessary. Of course, critics ask where M-theory came from. This is surprising since Dr.
What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe? Hawking is just one scientist, albeit highly famous.
In general, what do scientists believe? Numerous studies, regarding scientists in the United States, indicate about a third are atheists, a third agnostic, and a third believe in God or a higher power. Similar studies of the general population suggest that three-fourths of the population believes in God or a higher power.
What does this mean? The elegance and orderliness of scientific theories and mathematics becomes seductive and, in effect, replaces a need for a higher deity. However, this is not to say there is any unified conspiracy on the part of the scientific community to replace religion with science.
In fact, without intention, science and religious ethics appear to have much in common. The concepts which it uses to build up its coherent systems are not expressing emotions. As long as we remain within the realm of science proper, we can never meet with a sentence of the type: For something to be a true miracle, it must be outside the natural laws of science.
In effect, natural law is suspended, and a miracle happens. A majority of scientists have difficulty believing this. If I told you apples fall up instead of down, would you believe me? You probably would not even argue with me.
My guess is that you would likely be dismissive, and ignore me.To answer the title question, can science replace religion, I offer these thoughts. If you believe that science will ultimately be able to answer every question and enable humans to become god-like, then it is logical to assume science can replace religion.
Can Science Replace Religion? Posted on December 10, by admin | One Response Stephen Hawking, the world’s most famous scientist, made a startling statement on September 2, , one week prior to the release of his new book, The Grand Design.
On this topic, Barber claims that sports can replace religion. In one sense, I think he is right. The loyalty, community-identification, and limited transcendence of the experiences related to sports do fuflill many of the functions of religion for many people.
Jun 30, · Limits of Science Can Lead to Religion. For many researchers, the whole point of science is to replace religious teachings with verifiable theories, and to pretend otherwise is self-delusion. No, science cannot replace religion. No, I do not believe that science can ever replace religion.
I think both have a place in society. And neither will replace the other. There is no way that science will ever replace some people's believes and faiths in their religion.
I think people can find a way to incorporate both into their lives. Q: Can science replace faith/religion?Such as can science make people doubt spirituality and religion? A: Actually the average person is not smart enough to understand science the way it should be. Otherwise religion would have died out decades maybe centuries ago.